Check out our full line of miniature branch circuit breakers and supplementary protectors in a wide range of pole sizes, amperage ranges, and trip curves.
Thomas Edison patented a fuse for his electrical distribution system in 1890. Over 100 years later, fuses are still used to protect electrical wiring and equipment from damage due to surges and overload conditions.
If you think that the fuse predated the circuit breaker by decades, you would be right, sort of. Thomas Edison patented a circuit breaker design in 1879, eleven years before his fuse patent, even though the use of fuses predates that. (Thomas Edison must have gotten the idea to patent the fuse after watching all of those early light bulb filaments melt before his eyes.) Louis François Clément Breguet pioneered the use of fuse devices to protect telegraph wires from lightning strikes as far back as the 1860’s.
With both of these types of circuit protection being around since the post-U.S. Civil War reconstruction era, which one is better? If you read the literature from a company that primarily makes electrical fuses for industrial applications, the fuse is a superior solution. And, if you read the literature from a company that makes CBE’s (Circuit Breakers for Equipment), the circuit breaker is the best choice. So, which is it? After reading a lot of literature on both sides of the argument, the answer is both, or neither. If one was the runaway winner for all applications, we would know by now.
A circuit breaker is an electromechanical device. Even the simplest circuit breaker is more complicated than the most complicated fuse.
That’s a long list of the benefits of a circuit breaker, but what are the benefits of a fuse, over a circuit breaker?
Where does this leave us? Fuses offer circuit protection that is inexpensive, straightforward and fast protection. Their faster circuit protection time is perhaps their biggest benefit over circuit breakers. This is important when protecting sensitive electronic equipment. Circuit breakers provide better protection for three-phase applications. Because circuit breakers are NOT sacrificial, do not require replacement, as a fuse does, power can be more quickly restored without the need to hunt down a spare fuse. Consider the application, where it will be located, (remote or local), and the operating environment. Both fuses and circuit breakers will continue to have their place in electrical equipment installations.
When selecting an overcurrent protective device, it's crucial to ensure it matches the system voltage. An overcurrent protective device rated for the system voltage guarantees it can handle the electrical load without malfunctioning or posing safety risks.
If a device is not rated for the correct voltage, it might fail and cause equipment damage or safety hazards. Always check the voltage rating on the device's label or specification sheet to ensure it matches your system's needs. This compatibility is essential for protecting both the equipment and the entire electrical system.
When it comes to electrical systems, safety is paramount. One critical factor to consider is the maximum available fault current that a protective device might need to interrupt.
Fault current refers to the excessive electrical current that occurs during a fault condition, such as a short circuit. This surge can be dangerous, causing damage to electrical parts, fire hazards, and even injuries.
Several variables affect the maximum available fault current:
A protective device, like a circuit breaker or fuse, must be able to handle the maximum available fault current to ensure it disconnects power swiftly and safely. If it fails to do so, the consequences can be serious, including equipment damage and major safety risks.
Disclaimer:
The content provided is intended solely for general information purposes and is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering engineering or other professional advice or services. The practice of engineering is driven by site-specific circumstances unique to each project. Consequently, any use of this information should be done only in consultation with a qualified and licensed professional who can take into account all relevant factors and desired outcomes.
The information was posted with reasonable care and attention. However, it is possible that some information is incomplete, incorrect, or inapplicable to particular circumstances or conditions. We do not accept liability for direct or indirect losses resulting from using, relying or acting upon information in this blog post.
c3controls Headquarters, USA
664 State Street
Beaver, PA 15009
TEL 724.775.7926
FAX 724.775.5283